Intimidation or Impatience? Jump Bidding in On-line Ascending Automobile Auctions
نویسندگان
چکیده
We run a large field experiment with an online company specializing in selling used automobiles via ascending auctions. We manipulate experimentally the maximum amount which bidders can bid above the current standing price, thus affecting the ease with which bidders can engage in jump bidding. We test between the intimidation vs. costly bidding hypotheses of jump bidding by looking at the effect of these jump-bidding restrictions on average seller revenue. We find evidence consistent with costly bidding in one market (Texas), but intimidation in the other market (New York). This difference in findings between the two markets appears partly attributable to the more prominent presence of sellers who are car dealers in the Texas market. 1 We thank the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation for a grant which facilitated this research. We also thank Jimmy Roberts, Tom Ruchti, Art Zillante, and seminar participants at Chapman University for helpful comments.
منابع مشابه
A Theory of Jump Bidding in Ascending Auctions∗
Jump bidding is a commonly observed phenomenon that involves bidders in ascending auctions submitting bids higher than required by the auctioneer. Such behavior is typically explained as due to irrationality or to bidders signaling their value. We present field data that suggests such explanations are unsatisfactory and construct an alternative model in which jump bidding occurs due to strategi...
متن کاملJump Bidding Strategies in Internet Auctions
A strategy commonly observed in Internet auctions is that of “jump bidding,” or entering a bid larger than what is necessary to be a currently winning bidder. In this paper, we argue that the cost associated with entering online bids and the uncertainty about future entry—both of which distinguish Internet from live auctions—can explain this behavior. We present a simple theoretical model that ...
متن کاملBidder Behavior in a Common Value Simultaneous Ascending Auction
We develop and experimentally test a model of bidder behavior in a simultaneous ascending auction for heterogeneous common value goods. The model follows the ‘straightforward’ strategy developed by Milgrom (2000) while accounting for the adverse selection effect and the potential for the winner’s curse. When this model is evaluated against laboratory results we find that bidders deviate from th...
متن کامل1 Bidding Strategies in Internet Yankee Auctions
A bidding strategy commonly observed in Internet auctions, though not frequently in live auctions, is that of “jump-bidding,” or entering a bid larger than necessary to be a current high bidder. In this paper, we argue that the cost associated with entering on-line bids and the uncertainty concerning bidding competition -both of which distinguish Internet from live auctions -can explain this ph...
متن کاملJump bidding and overconcentration in decentralized simultaneous ascending auctions
A model of English auctions is proposed to incorporate the possibility of jump bidding. When two objects are sold separately via such auctions, bidders signal their willingness to pay via jump bids, thereby forming rational expectations of the prices without relying on any central mediator. Hence a multi-item bidder does not suffer the exposure problem of having to buy an item while he is uncer...
متن کامل